The track of this occultation was predicted to cover the region between approximately Wellington and Wanganui, NZ. Occultation reports were received from Wanganui and Pukerua Bay, about 30 km north of Wellington, while an observer at Waikanae, between the two, did not report an event.
View the updated prediction.
Observers: 1 R. Skilton, Wanganui, NZ 2(M) J. Talbot, Waikanae, NZ 3 G. Hudson, Pukerua Bay, NZ M = Miss
The circle represents the predicted 60 km diameter of Patricia.
Discussion:
It is clear that not all reports received can be correct. In Wanganui, Ross Skilton was observing in a clear sky under good conditions. He was confident of his result, in spite of the fact that the star was mag 11.9 and this was the first occultation he has timed. His times are however consistent with Steve Preston's updated prediction.
In Waikanae, John Talbot was observing with only a 10 cm scope and noted that the star was right on the limit of visibility. He noted that if the star had disappeared he might well have not recorded the event, saying that he would not put higher than 50% confidence on his result.
In Pukerua Bay, Gordon Hudson was observing with a 30 cm scope but noted that the star was very difficult to see and appeared to fade in and out of visibility due to the seeing conditions. Further, Gordon's reported times, when reduced against the fundamental plane, are significantly offset from those expected should Ross Skilton's result be real.
Finally, while asteroids can sometimes have axes rather longer than their estimated diameters (which are derived from IRAS data), the length of one axis of Patricia would have to be at least twice the predicted size of the asteroid if the Wanganui and Pukerua Bay results are to be reconciled.
In summary, taking into account the comments of all the observers involved, it is most likely that the Wanganui result is real and the Pukerua Bay result spurious, with the Waikanae result being indeterminate.
Observational Data:
Observer's Name : Ross Skilton Aperture (cm) : 20 Focal length (cm) : 203 Type (e.g. SCT; Newtonian) : SCT Magnification : 12.5mm Plossl=162x Observing site name : Tayforth, Wanganui Longitude (DD MM SS ; East +ve) : 174 59 55 East Latitude (DD MM SS ; South -ve) : -39 55 02 South Height above Sealevel (metres) : 56 m Geodetic Datum (e.g.WGS84,NZ1949): NZ1949 Height Datum (if known) : - Sky Transparency (Delete two) : Good Star Image Stability (Delete two): Good Other Conditions : Gentle W breeze, Clear sky. No Moon, Dark site Time Source (e.g. WWVH, GPS) : WWVH Recording method (e.g. tape) : Tape Could you see the Asteroid? : No Approx. Limiting Magnitude : 13.5 | Estimated | Universal Time | Reaction | Accuracy, Remarks h m s | Time (sec) | Started Observing : 06:31:00 Disappearance At : 06:34:40.1 Reappearance At : 06:34:43.8 Seemed good Stopped Observing : 06:36:00 Was your reaction time (also known as Personal Equation) subtracted from any of the above timings? : Yes If YES, state value : 0.4s disappear /0.3s reappear ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: First MP occ where I wasn't clouded out. Equipment performed well but don't know reaction time. Average occultation time from tape is 5.43sec, agrees reasonably with stopwatch at scope of 5.49sec. Observer's Name : John Talbot Aperture (cm) : 10cm Focal length (cm) : 700cm Type (e.g. SCT; Newtonian) : Newtonian, Saxon on Equatorial mount Magnification : 28x (25mm eye piece) Observing site name : 3 Hughes St, Waikanae Beach Longitude (DD MM SS ; East +ve) : 175 01 56.6 Latitude (DD MM SS ; South -ve) : -40 51 19.1 Height above Sealevel (metres) : 5m Geodetic Datum (e.g.WGS84,NZ1949): WGS84 Height Datum (if known) : MSL Sky Transparency (Delete two) : Good Star Image Stability (Delete two): Fair Other Conditions: Strong wind 30kph+ , Cloud on East horizon but clear in target area, some suburban lights Time Source (e.g. WWVH, GPS) : WWV 10MHz Recording method (e.g. tape) : Tape Could you see the Asteroid? : no Approx. Limiting Magnitude : ~11 | Estimated | Universal Time | Reaction | Accuracy, Remarks h m s | Time (sec) | Started Observing : 6:15:00 Stopped Observing : 6:40:00 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: This was my first serious attempt at observing an occultation but in the event while I could just make out the target star , I was not able to spot changes , I suspect due to lack of experience and working right at limit of my scope and site. I will be trying again in the future. Accuracy of this obs for null result: Well as I said it was my first real attempt so took me while to get lined up. I am 90% sure I was looking at the right group of 3 faint stars with the target in center. My scope and conditions were right at the limit as far as I am concerned. Target was quoted as M 11.9 and I was only just able to separate it from background so it would have been easy to miss the dip in brightness. Wind was strong so scope was shaking a bit but no so much I could not keep stars in view - I did tuck in behind the fence to mimimise wind. I did lose concentration a couple time but only for a second or two. Overall I would not put a high confidence on a null - certainly not above 50%. Observer's Name : Gordon Hudson Aperture (cm) : 30cm Focal length (cm) : 300cm Type (e.g. SCT; Newtonian) : Cassegrain Magnification : 120 Observing site name : Kotipu Place Observatory Longitude (DD MM SS ; East +ve) : 174E 52' 54.36" Latitude (DD MM SS ; South -ve) : 41S 02' 27.61" Height above Sealevel (metres) : 108.5 metres Geodetic Datum (e.g.WGS84,NZ1949): NZ1949 Height Datum (if known) : - Sky Transparency (Delete two) : Average Star Image Stability (Delete two): Fair Other Conditions: (Wind, Clouds, Lights, etc.):Clear & Gusty Time Source (e.g. WWVH, GPS) : GPS Recording method (e.g. tape) : Computer Could you see the Asteroid? : No Approx. Limiting Magnitude : 12 | Estimated | Universal Time | Reaction | Accuracy,Remarks h m s | Time (sec) | Started Observing :6:20:00 Disappearance At :6:35:22 Spurious? Reappearance At :6:35:28 Spurious? Stopped Observing :6:45:00 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Star was very difficult to see and appeared to fade in and out of visibility due to the seeing conditions.
[Top of Page][Return to Home Page]