An approximately 19 second occultation was reported by Brian Loader in Darfield, NZ, and an approximately 10.5 second occultation by Clive Rowe in Waddington, not far away. However timings in each case were affected by the poor observing conditions.
View the updated prediction.
Observers: 1 B. Loader, Darfield, NZ 2 C. Rowe, Waddington, NZ
The circle represents the predicted 111 km diameter of Messalina.
Discussion:
This occultation was observed from two relatively close sites - Brian Loader in Darfield, NZ, and Clive Rowe in Waddington, NZ. Both observers reported that the star could only be seen by averted vision, and that this has significantly affected their timings. (See observers' comments below). This is further borne out by the fact that the two very different chord lengths, reported this close together, cannot represent a true cross-section across the asteroid.
Unfortunately, while both observers were positive about seeing an event, the times are so uncertain as to make it impossible to derive any additional information about the minor planet.
Observational Data:
Observer's Name : Brian Loader Aperture (cm) : 25.4 Focal length (cm) : 250 Type (e.g. SCT; Newtonian) : SCT Magnification : 80x Observing site name : Darfield Longitude (DD MM SS ; East +ve) : +172° 06' 24.4" E Latitude (DD MM SS ; South -ve) : -43° 28' 52.9" S Height above Sealevel (metres) : 210 Geodetic Datum (e.g.WGS84,NZ1949): WGS84 Height Datum (if known) : MSL Sky Transparency (Delete two) : Good Star Image Stability (Delete two): Fair Other Conditions: (Wind, Clouds, Lights, etc.): nil Time Source (e.g. WWVH, GPS) : GPS Recording method (e.g. tape) : KIWI/Computer Could you see the Asteroid? : no Approx. Limiting Magnitude : 13 | Estimated | Universal Time | Reaction | Accuracy, Remarks h m s | Time (sec) | Started Observing : 09:25:20 Disappearance At : 09:27:15 1.7 subtracted very approximate Reappearance At : 09:27:34 2.0 subtracted possibly late, see notes Stopped Observing : 09:28:45 Was your reaction time (also known as Personal Equation) subtracted from any of the above timings? : yes If YES, state value : as above ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Visual observation by averted vision. Times are very approximate, the PE used are partly to round off to a second. In view of Clive Rowe's report, it seems quite likely I missed the reappearance altogether. In all honesty, I think that all that can be said is that an event occurred, and that it probably started at about the predicted time for the mid event. Also, in the light of Clive's report, it may have been considerably shorter than the predicted maximum duration of 19.2 seconds. Observer's Name : Clive Rowe Aperture (cm) : 33 cm Focal length (cm) : 150 cm Type (e.g. SCT; Newtonian) : Newtonian / non-driven equatorial Magnification : 60 x Observing site name : Waddington Longitude (DD MM SS ; East +ve) : +172 02 02 Latitude (DD MM SS ; South -ve) : -43 23 58 Height above Sealevel (metres) : 300 Geodetic Datum (e.g.WGS84,NZ1949): Garmin GPS Height Datum (if known) : Sky Transparency (Delete two) : Good Star Image Stability (Delete two): Fair Other Conditions: (Wind, Clouds, Lights, etc.): Clear night, light wind Time Source (e.g. WWVH, GPS) : WWVH Recording method (e.g. tape) : WWVH aural count plus stopwatch (no tape) Could you see the Asteroid? : No Approx. Limiting Magnitude : 12.5 | Estimated | Universal Time | Reaction | Accuracy, Remarks h m s | Time (sec) | Started Observing : 09:20 Started field identification approx - 1 hour prior occ Star and Object Merged : na (not applicable, asteroid not visible) Disappearance At approx : 09:27:18 (lost count of WWVH time, no tape recorder) Estimated Closest Approach : na Reappearance At : watch was stopped, reading 9.5 seconds with about 1 sec delay Star and Object Separated : Stopped Observing : 09:29 (target still visible 09:50) Was your reaction time (also known as Personal Equation) subtracted from any of the above timings? : Yes: >2 second at ingress delayed by check on visibility by averted vision, approx. 1 second delay on egress Hence occultation DURATION: 9.5 + >2 -1 = >10.5 seconds. error. est >2 and -1 seconds ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: This was (again) a marginal observation as averted vision was used to see the target star and this produced additional delays in timing. In my (1/2 deg.) field, the star just above the target was used to guide the averted vision position. My estimate of ingress time was 09:27:18 but this may have been late.
[Top of Page][Return to Home Page]